Friday, December 23, 2022

Eyes Wide Shut - What's in a Name?

Since 2018, I have been writing a yearly article about Eyes Wide Shut around Christmas because it is my favorite Christmas movie. Part of the reason why I love this movie so much is because I come away with something different each time I watch it, and I even change my mind from viewing to viewing when it comes to what is real and what is either a dream or staged during Bill Harford’s wacky night. This year, Bill’s treatment of names stuck out the most.


Before I get into it, I want to clarify that this is not about the meaning of names in the film. This is about the names Bill remembers and the one name he forgets. The only thing I’ll point out about actual names is that Bill's last name is Harford, not Hartford (as I see it erroneously spelled in so many articles), and this slightly odd name is a result of Kubrick wanting a Harrison Ford type, which becomes Harford. But enough about that IMDb trivia-type shit.


Bill Harford is a man who is extremely concerned about appearances. He is doing well as a doctor, but he aspires to be at the top of society, which is why he has ingratiated himself with patients like Victor Ziegler. But even more than this, he wants to be seen as a man. This is why he turns into a frat bro with Nick Nightingale (just watch how many times these two playfully pat each other during their short conversation at the party), and it’s why Bill feels the need to revenge cheat on Alice after her revelation about the naval officer. I don’t think that Bill is actually all that bothered about her wanting another man; he’s just concerned with what it says about him as a man that she would want anyone other than him. This is accentuated by the college dudes who seem to materialize from Bill’s subconscious to accost him in the street and question his sexuality. The struggle within Bill is that this is something out of his control, which is what makes the night increasingly foolhardy. This is why things that Bill can control are so important, and one of those things is the ability to remember names.


Bill remembers literally every character’s name in this film except Roz, Helena’s babysitter for the night of Ziegler’s party. It happens so early in the film that it doesn’t appear to be that big of a deal at first. As the film goes on, though, it becomes a glaring omission. 


At the party, Bill is able to spot a college classmate who dropped out, and he remembers his full name. Later, he meets a couple models, and when one of them, Nuala, introduces herself Bill even asks how she spells her name. The first time I saw this I thought it was just a lame way of flirting, but now I think he sincerely wanted to remember her name. 


Those first two examples aren’t all that exceptional, but it quickly becomes apparent that names are important when Bill shows up for work the next day. He addresses the secretary, Lisa, by name, then tells her to ask Janelle to bring his coffee, and he greets Sarah by name as he walks into his office. Yes, he should know the names of co-workers, but why would Kubrick make a point to introduce three character names in less than thirty seconds other than to make a point about Bill’s obsession with names?


This could all be dismissed until we meet Rosa, the maid at the Nathansons. Bill greets her by name when he shows up after Nathanson has died. To be clear, he should remember her name. The point of all this isn’t that he should not be remembering all these names; it’s that it’s fucked up that the only name he needs help remembering in the entire film is the woman taking care of his daughter. No offense to Rosa, but Roz is a more important person in Bill’s life. 


But remembering Roz’s name doesn’t do anything for Bill’s appearance. She is someone who is paid to stay in his apartment and watch his daughter. It wouldn’t impress anyone if he remembered her name. Now, if someone happened to notice that Bill remembered Rosa’s name, then perhaps they would think this is a man who cares, or at least appears to.


This also brings up what type of parent Bill is. Alice is a stay-at-home mom, so she handles most of the parenting. Bill seems to be attentive when he’s home, but he doesn’t interact with Helena all that much, and she becomes an afterthought. She even walks out of frame at the end of the movie, and both Bill and Alice fail to notice that she’s not in sight anymore. There are conspiracy theories about this scene regarding two men seen near Helena, but I’m not wading into that territory. I tend to go with the simpler explanation that Helena disappears at the end because she is not on either parent’s mind at the moment. 


But I would argue that Helena is almost never on Bill’s mind, while Alice brings her up and interacts with her much more than Bill. The parent in me just wants to focus on the absent parent aspect of Bill’s character, but I don’t think that’s the point to take away from this. Bill, in his quest to appear as a member of the upper crust who should be able to go to orgies and shit, thinks that childcare is something that is handled by wives and nameless babysitters. It’s all about appearances, and kids don’t factor into the appearance that Bill aspires to project. Too bad he doesn’t realize it’s not working. But hey, at least Rosa feels seen when Dr. Bill shows up.


Is Any of It Real?


I typically believe that the night actually happens because it’s too messy to argue that any or all of it is a dream. It’s meant to be dream-like, but I don’t think Kubrick is trying to say this is all just subconscious fantasy. As for where I stand on Ziegler’s claim that all the orgy stuff was staged, I tend to believe him. This time, I believe him because of the interaction with the desk clerk at Nick’s hotel. Why go to the trouble of taking Nick back to his hotel and telling the clerk someone would be by for any future correspondence? If they’re going to kill Nick, then they would’ve just killed him, and one of the goons could’ve taken care of the hotel room. They certainly wouldn’t bring Nick to the hotel and create a scene if they were going to kill him. But Alan Cumming makes a strange face when Bill leaves, like he just finished a performance and is relieved. Sure, this is probably because Kubrick had him do this scene ninety times, but still the camera lingers on him. I don’t fucking know. That’s why I love this movie. Any time I think I know what is real or isn’t, I find evidence to change my mind.


Random Thoughts


Alice knows Bill will likely forget Roz's name even after she just reminded Bill, which is why she makes a point to address her by name before they leave. This is clearly something she has to deal with all the time.


He remembered Peter Grenning's name even though Grenning moved away over a year ago and was clearly no longer his patient. And he remembered that the dude owned a fucking costume shop? His brain fascinates me.


I'm surprised Bill didn't ask the masked goons what their names were on the way into the orgy.


The Sonata Cafe has a doorman and a host? Neither appear to be necessary. But we are talking about a club that would book a pianist from across the country for a two week gig. That place must've closed down soon after, especially since that prick piano player didn't show up the next night.


Ziegler saw him talking to Nick…but then ran off to the bathroom to bang Mandy?


I've gone into some color theory stuff in the past, but I still mainly like the Christmas setting as an excuse to make everything beautifully lit.




Monday, December 19, 2022

2022 Indiana Film Journalists Association Awards



The Indiana Film Journalists Association has voted “Everything Everywhere All at Once” as the Best Film of 2022. The fantasy comedy/drama centered on a Chinese-American woman fighting a multi-dimensional battle won a total of four honors including Ke Huy Quan for Best Supporting Performance, Paul Rogers for Best Editing and the Original Vision Award, which recognizes a film that is especially distinct and innovative.


Indian action/musical “RRR” was the runner-up for Best Film and also won Best Foreign Language Film and the new category of Best Stunt/Movement Choreography.


Eight other films were voted Finalists for Best Film. Along with the winner and runner-up, they represent the IFJA’s selection as the top 10 movies of the year. 


Cate Blanchett won Best Lead Performance playing a complex, abusive musical director in “TÁR.” For the first time, IFJA has combined its leading and supporting acting awards into single gender-neutral categories. 


“TÁR” also earned Best Director and Best Original Screenplay awards for Todd Field.


Sarah Polley won the Best Adapted Screenplay award for “Women Talking,” which was also recognized for Best Ensemble Acting.


Best Animated Film went to “Marcel the Shell with Shoes On,” which also took the Best Vocal/Motion Capture Performance award for Jenny Slate. “I Didn’t See You There” won Best Documentary.


Charlotte Wells took Breakout of the Year honors for her mature, layered debut as the writer-director of “Aftersun.” Michael Giacchino earned Best Musical Score for “The Batman.” Hoyte Van Hoytema won Best Cinematography for “Nope.”


The Edward Johnson-Ott Hoosier Award, which goes to a film or filmmaker with Indiana ties, went to Joshua Hull, co-writer of the horror film “Glorious.”


IFJA members issued this statement for the Edward Johnson-Ott Hoosier Award:

 

“Joshua Hull is the rare Hoosier filmmaker who proved you don’t have to leave Indiana to make movies. He’s seen his career rise steadily as a writer, director and producer with local productions like “Chopping Block.” With the release of “Glorious,” Hull has broken out with mainstream success in a highly inventive film that blurs the line between horror, fantasy and character study. The IFJA looks forward eagerly to his next efforts.”

 

In addition to the winner, IFJA recognizes a runner-up in each category (with one exception, noted below). Here is a complete list:


Best Picture

Winner: “Everything Everywhere All at Once”

Runner-up: “RRR”

 

Finalists: (listed alphabetically)

“After Yang”

“The Banshees of Inisherin”

“Decision to Leave”

“Glass Onion: A Knives Out Mystery”

“Marcel the Shell with Shoes On”

“TÁR”

“Top Gun: Maverick”

“Women Talking”

 

Best Animated Film

Winner: “Marcel the Shell with Shoes On”

Runner-up: “Guillermo del Toro's Pinocchio”

 

Best Foreign Language Film

Winner: “RRR”

Runner-up: “Decision to Leave”

 

Best Documentary Film

Winner: “I Didn't See You There”

Runner-up: “Bad Axe”

 

Best Original Screenplay

Winner: Todd Field, “TÁR”

Runner-up: Martin McDonagh, “The Banshees of Inisherin”

 

Best Adapted Screenplay

Winner: Sarah Polley, “Women Talking”

Runner-up: Kogonada, “After Yang”

 

Best Director

Winner: Todd Field, “TÁR”

Runner-up: Dan Kwan and Daniel Scheinert, “Everything Everywhere All at Once”

 

Best Lead Performance

Winner: Cate Blanchett, “TÁR”

Runner-up: Michelle Yeoh, “Everything Everywhere All at Once”

 

Best Supporting Performance

Winner: Ke Huy Quan, “Everything Everywhere All at Once”

Runner-up: Brendan Gleeson, “The Banshees of Inisherin”

 

Best Vocal/Motion Capture Performance

Winner: Jenny Slate, “Marcel the Shell With Shoes On”

Runner-up: Isabella Rossellini, “Marcel the Shell with Shoes On”

 

Best Ensemble Acting

Winner: “Women Talking”

Runner-up: “Glass Onion: A Knives Out Mystery”

 

Best Musical Score

Winner: Michael Giacchino, “The Batman”

Runner-up: M.M. Keeravani, “RRR”

 

Breakout of the Year

Winner: Charlotte Wells (writer-director, “Aftersun”)

Runner-up: Jane Schoenbrun (writer-director, “We're All Going to the World's Fair”)

 

Best Cinematography

Winner: Hoyte Van Hoytema, “Nope”

Runner-up: Claudio Miranda, “Top Gun: Maverick”

 

Best Editing

Winner: Paul Rogers, “Everything Everywhere All at Once”

Runner-up: Kim Sang-bum, “Decision to Leave”

 

Best Stunt/Movement Choreography

Winner: Vicky Arora (action design and weapons trainer/stunt coordinator) and Raicho Vasilev (fight choreographer/stunt coordinator), and Prem Rakshith (dance choreographer), “RRR”

Runner-up: Daniel Hernandez (stunt coordinator/fight coordinator), Grant Powell (stunt coordinator), and Jénel Stevens (fight choreographer), “The Woman King”

 

Original Vision Award

Winner: “Everything Everywhere All At Once”

Runner-up: “Marcel the Shell With Shoes On”

 

The Edward Johnson-Ott Hoosier Award*

Winner: Joshua Hull (“Glorious”)


*As a special honor, no runner-up is named for the Hoosier Award. It is named after founding IFJA member and longtime NUVO Newsweekly critic Edward Johnson-Ott.


About IFJA: The Indiana Film Journalists Association was established in 2009 to celebrate cinema and promote quality film criticism in the Hoosier State. To be eligible, a film must have had a general release on any platform during the current calendar year, screened to IFJA critics in advance of a following year general release date, or play in a major Indiana film festival.

 

http://indianafilmjournalists.com


Wednesday, October 26, 2022

Halloween 4, 5, and 6 - The Thorn Trilogy

This is where shit starts to get crazy. Since the fanbase was so pissed off with Season of the Witch, they decided to bring Michael Myers and Loomis back. And they also introduced Laurie’s daughter into the mix (and killed Laurie offscreen in the interim). The fourth film just does its best to bring the series back to the original formula, and it’s okay. Honestly, the only crazy thing about this movie is that Loomis survived the explosion at the end of Halloween II. I’m glad that he did, though, because this could be called The Loomis Trilogy just as much as The Thorn Trilogy. 


 Loomis is a bit more unhinged in this one, culminating in him trying to shit a child at the end. The fifth movie truly unleashes him, though. In that one, Laurie’s daughter Jamie is a mute due to her interactions with Michael in the previous film, but she seems to have a psychic connection to him now. 


What makes this one nuts is that Loomis has lost all sense of humanity. He has no interest in protecting Jamie at this point. Instead, she is just a tool to catch Michael. This leads to scenes of Loomis screaming in Jamie’s face, and he eventually holds her up to bait Michael at the end. It’s fucking fantastic. But things also get messy with the fifth one…well, messier.


So the fourth film made it seem like Michael’s evil could be transferred. The fifth film expanded on that with the psychic connection aspect, but there was an added, seemingly random element: the man in black. A man in black appears throughout the movie, most notably at the end. After Loomis captures him, Michael is taken to jail to await transfer to a maximum security facility. The man in black shows up, kills the entire police force (that’s two years in a row that this police force was completely killed off, by the way), and frees Michael. That’s the end. There’s no explanation as to who this guy is or anything. Apparently, it would be explained in the next movie. But while the fourth and fifth movies came out in back to back years, it would be six years before the sixth movie came out.


Halloween 6 (the title has the numeral in the Producer’s Cut) is the messiest movie in the series. At first, an attempt was made to explain the man in black, but the studio hated it. The film was recut to get rid of the more ridiculous story elements, but it also made the movie almost impossible to follow. Because of this, there are two cuts: the theatrical cut and the Producer’s Cut. I’ll mainly be referencing the Producer’s Cut because it’s the version of the film that truly makes this the Thorn Trilogy. But both versions are fucking stupid. So let’s finally get into this Thorn nonsense.


If you make the same slasher villain reappear so many times, eventually you will need to explain why he can’t die. Friday the 13th finally did this with their sixth film, Jason Lives, which has Jason’s corpse get struck by lightning, turning him into the immortal monster we all love instead of just being a guy in a mask. With Halloween 6, the filmmakers decided it was time to finally explain how Michael has been surviving all this shit since Halloween II. It turns out he’s been the tool of the Cult of Thorn, which is run by the random doctor from the first film who argues with Loomis about whether or not Michael can drive. He’s the man in black who’s been pulling the strings all along! What…the…fuck.


So Michael is being controlled by this cult. It’s very unclear what their goal is, but it has something to do with runes and Druid shit (kind of like Season of the Witch), and they need Michael to rape and impregnate his niece, so that their incestuous baby can be killed, which will allow his young cousin (?) Danny to carry on the killing. It’s not clear why Michael can’t just keep doing the killing on his own, but whatever. Eventually, Paul Rudd puts some magic rocks on the ground that stop Michael. This is the kind of stupid shit a franchise has to do when the villain isn’t allowed to be killed off. 


Despite the confusing mess that Halloween 6 created, I actually kind of like the Thorn Trilogy. They could have just kept bringing Michael back to life with little to no explanation. Instead, some poor bastard felt the need to justify his survival. As a fan of weird shit, I’m glad they tried. But no amount of ironic enjoyment can lead me to think of any of these films as “good.” I’m not the intended audience for this shit, anyway. This is probably why after this debacle, the next film decided to just forget this shit ever happened.



Random Thoughts (for Halloween 6)


I'm willing to bet Loomis has fired a gun more times than any other cinematic psychiatrist. 


I’m not going to get into the weeds about differences in the two cuts too much. Just watch the same videos I did if you want that. I do want to point out a couple things I found interesting, though.


In the Producer’s Cut, Loomis explains he had plastic surgery done, which is why his scars are gone. This very short exchange is taken out of the theatrical cut? Why? Did they intentionally create plot holes?


They clearly only had the baby for a few scenes because that is the most bundled up baby in the history of bundled up babies in all the other scenes. It’s a good thing they used a fake baby for most of the scenes, though, because the way Kara is running with it at the end of the Producer’s Cut would surely have broken its neck.


The Producer’s Cut is definitely the more cohesive movie, but they did alter my favorite kill. In the theatrical cut, the evil dad gets electrocuted until his fucking head explodes. It’s amazing. In the theatrical cut, he just dies from electrocution. Lame. But this is literally the only thing that’s better about the theatrical cut.


Watching Paul Rudd sincerely talk about runes and shit adds another level of enjoyment to this messy film. He actually gets to say, “The power of the runes stopped him.”


According to IMDb trivia, there was an unfilmed scene in which the man in black admits to teaching Michael how to drive years ago. God, I wish they had put this in, especially since this character makes such a big deal about Michael being able to drive in the first film.



Tuesday, October 25, 2022

Halloween III: Season of the Witch - The Outlier

My feelings about the slasher genre are constantly changing. For instance, when I went through the Friday the 13th franchise last year, I was pretty negative about Part V, which is the entry in which Jason was a copycat. I wanted the real Jason. Yet as I went through the Halloween series, especially the most recent film, I found myself not giving a fuck who was behind the mask, or even if the mask was in the movie at all. Maybe it’s just that I don’t hold the Halloween franchise in the same regard as Friday the 13th. Who knows? I bring it up because Halloween III: Season of the Witch is one of my favorite movies in the series. But that wasn’t always the case.


The first time I watched this movie was because the How Did This Get Made? podcast covered it. I found it annoying more than anything, and I thought it was completely ridiculous that Michael Myers wasn’t in a Halloween movie. This time around, however, I appreciated how batshit crazy this movie is, and I’m not alone. This film’s reputation has improved over the years because once you accept that Myers isn’t in it, you can have fun with it.


The crazy plot still cracks me up. It has taken me three viewings over the years to figure the plot out (that fucking Silver Shamrock song getting stuck in my head each time doesn’t help), and I’m still not sure I completely understand it, but here goes: an Irish maskmaker is attempting to please the old Druid gods by selling every child in America a mask with a Stonehenge-infused microchip that, when activated, kills the child and makes snakes and bugs and shit come out of their head. Yeah. And the only person who can stop him is a drunken, horny Tom Atkins.


Tom Atkins plays a divorced doctor who’s never there for his kids. For instance, instead of making time to be with them for Halloween, he runs off with a deceased patient’s daughter to play detective. Why would a doctor suddenly do this? Because he wants to bang the patient’s daughter, of course. 


I can see how all of this would have pissed off Halloween fans when it was first released, but looking at it now, it’s a refreshing change of pace. John Carpenter wanted to be done with Michael Myers after the first film, much less the second. So this was his chance (as a producer) to turn the series into a yearly anthology, featuring a new spooky story each time. He just underestimated how much people just want to see the same shit over and over.


As I pointed out in my last article, I find the Michael Myers character to be the murderous Shape that he’s credited as. There’s nothing there, really. So a Halloween movie without him is more interesting than infuriating. I’m aware I’m in the minority when it comes to Myers, and most fans like this movie only because they now know Myers would come back. I would’ve been okay if he had stayed dead.


This series would be much more interesting if shit completely changed up with each movie, but no one wants that, as evidenced by the tonal and story shifts of the most recent trilogy. Fans of this series cannot be pleased en masse, which is what Carpenter realized with this, leading to his disassociation with the series for decades after this movie. 


The series would go on to bend over backwards to justify bringing Michael back from the dead, and when that got too stupid, they started ignoring sequels, and when those got too stupid, they rebooted the whole thing, and when that got too stupid, they went back and decided to ignore everything except the one film everyone agreed was great. Season of the Witch was the only film with the balls to move on from Michael, and that somehow makes it one of the best Halloween movies. But unfortunately, you can only keep an iconic slasher down for one movie…

Monday, October 24, 2022

Halloween & Halloween II - The Originals

After burning through the entire Texas Chainsaw Massacre franchise, I originally planned to take a break from horror films, especially long franchises. Then I realized Halloween Ends was coming out, and someone asked me what I thought about H20, a movie I had never seen. Rather than being sensible and planning on tackling the Halloween series next year, I decided to watch every one of these stupid fucking movies in one week. And I did it, but I’m not writing a full article on each film. Instead, I decided to break it down into segments:


  • Halloween and Halloween II - The Originals

  • Halloween III: Season of the Witch - The Outlier

  • Halloween 4: The Return of Michael Myers, Halloween 5: The Revenge of Michael Myers, and Halloween 6: The Curse of Michael Myers - The Thorn Trilogy

  • Halloween H20: 20 Years Later and Halloween: Resurrection - The Copycats

  • Halloween and Halloween II - The Zombie Movies

  • Halloween, Halloween Kills, and Halloween Ends - The New Trilogy


I learned from writing about the Massacre movies that there were going to be entries in this series that I just didn’t have much to say about, but thankfully the series is easily broken up, aside from the third movie. But before I get into the first two films, I wanted to comment on the series as a whole a bit.


This series isn’t sacred to me, so I’m not going to dwell on what a Michael Myers movie should be or anything like that. This is all going to be about my personal enjoyment of these movies, even if I might consider the vast majority of them to be technically “bad” movies. Even though I hadn’t seen a lot of this series before I started this, I still knew these were going to be easy watches (aside from the Zombie movies) because I find the slasher genre to be almost relaxing at this point. In other words, these articles are just my personal ramblings, and I’m going to be way too forgiving of some of these films, and I might be too harsh on others, but it’s all going to be my honest response based on what I want from these movies. Enough vague nonsense, here are my thoughts on the first two movies.



After watching all of these movies, I can safely consider myself a fan of the Halloween series, but before that, I truly did not care for these movies. And that goes for the sacred first film, as well. I kind of viewed it the same way I think about Citizen Kane, acknowledging that this was a groundbreaking film that changed future films for decades, but I personally wasn’t all that impressed with it. 


So this has always been a movie I knew I should love, but just didn’t. On top of that, I’ve become a huge John Carpenter fan over the years. How could I not love his most famous film? Because of this, I have watched the first film many times, and I’ve always just thought it was okay.


This time around, I appreciated how easy it was to rewatch this movie, and how creepy it is without being gory or going for cheap scares. I learned that I fucking love seeing Michael Myers in daylight. It’s so much creepier to see him standing behind some sheets or by a hedge than it is to see his face appear in the dark. It’s not that seeing his face in the dark is not scary, it’s just expected. Slashers are typically nighttime monsters. You might think seeing them during the day would lessen the effect or, worse, make them look downright goofy. But it works for Myers, and this is one of the main reasons why I’m not crazy about the second film, which takes place entirely at night. 


More than seeing a daytime monster, the original Halloween, and the series as a whole, is defined by its music. Carpenter’s score is iconic, at this point, and it still works. Usually, an effective score shouldn’t be noticed, but that’s not the case here as I find the score to be the star of the film. It does such an amazing job of taking what could be boring, long scenes and turning them into extremely tense moments.


Appreciating the atmosphere and pace of the film this time around also made me realize something that opened up my enjoyment of the entire series: I don’t give a fuck about Michael Myers. Don’t get me wrong, the outfit and ever-changing mask is synonymous with slasher films, but The Shape is really just a shell of a character. Later films, starting with the second, would attempt to expand on this character, and it’s been downhill ever since. 


I don’t care who’s under that mask. I’m fine with Loomis just telling me he’s pure evil at this point and must be stopped. Good enough for me. I need no motivation. There’s a killer out there, and he must be stopped. That’s the fucking movie. 


In defense of the films that followed, what else could they do? You can’t just have this dead-eyed fucker showing up for no fucking reason other than its Halloween and the local insane asylum has atrocious security and transport personnel. 


I’m not naive enough to say they should have stopped after the first film, but they truly had nowhere else to go with Myers as a character, which is why they added the Laurie-is-his-secret-sister element. Once I accepted that I would never like The Shape more than I did in the first film, it was easy to accept the increasingly goofy sequels. 


Speaking of sequels, the first sequel, Halloween II, is…okay. I already mentioned that I don’t dig the constant night of the movie, and the sister reveal isn’t great, but the story had to go somewhere. Aside from that, there’s another pet peeve I have with the setting: the abandoned hospital. Maybe things were different in the late ‘70s, but in my experience, hospitals are constantly well-lit and populated by more than three people. But maybe the ‘70s were different. Anyway, I just don’t like the setting of the sequel.


Beside that, Michael gets some fun kills (the crazy hot sauna comes to mind) and Loomis gets to run around spouting off cryptic nonsense (“You don’t know what death is!”), so it has its moments. 


By having Michael survive and seem fine soon after the events of the first film, Halloween II also reveals Michael to be so evil that he’s supernatural and possibly cannot be killed. I’m actually fine with this. If you don’t make these slasher villains supernatural, then these movies get too dumb. Because, come on, what normal guy can walk through a hospital door like Michael does at the end?


This brings up one of the common problems with this franchise: is Michael supernatural or just a really strong, evil fucker? The first film made it seem like it was the latter. Yes, he survived some seeming unsurvivable shit, but for all we knew, he was crawling in some bushes, barely alive after he disappeared. Halloween II, however, presents Michael as completely fine. In fact, he’s stronger now. Even though they do try to make it clear that he dies at the end, his ability to bounce back from his injuries in the first film make it clear that he is supernatural. 


This isn’t a problem in general, but the series either went too goofy explaining that he was supernatural (hello, Thorn trilogy), or he’s simply supernaturally strong because slasher villains are supposed to be (H20, Halloween: Resurrection). It’s just uneven. And this applies to the new trilogy, as well, with Michael going from man to supernatural evil killing machine back to man (which I’m actually okay with, as I’ll explain when I get to those movies). This is why I’m a bigger fan of the Friday the 13th series, which finally said, “Fuck it, just Frankenstein Jason’s ass and make him unkillable. Hell, make his evil into a butt worm that travels from person to person, who cares? Just keep making these fucking things!” The Halloween franchise never had that definitive moment because of the messy timelines and multiple reboots, making Michael Myers the most inconsistent villain in slasherdom.


I still kind of love these movies, which is a testament to the first film. Perhaps that’s the problem; the first film was too good to live up to, and the harder filmmakers tried to one-up the original, the more it became apparent that that was impossible. This is why John Carpenter was right about this series all along. After reluctantly writing the script for the second film, he decided the series should move on from Michael Myers all together. Season of the Witch is coming up next.