Showing posts with label John Heard. Show all posts
Showing posts with label John Heard. Show all posts

Monday, April 27, 2026

Cutter's Way - Radiance 4K

Cutter’s Way (out now on 4K from Radiance) is a movie I’ve seen referenced here and there over the years and always meant to watch but never did for whatever reason. Now that it’s out on 4K, I had a chance to finally rectify that, and I’m glad I did. This is one of those older movies that opens my eyes for other films I love because it was clearly an inspiration for other filmmakers. But what puts it on another level is how deceptively simple the story is in a way that makes it compelling on its own and depressingly relevant decades later.

But let me get the most obvious topic out of the way, first. John Heard is great in this, and anyone who only knows him as the Home Alone dad or even the corrupt cop in The Sopranos needs to watch this. At first glance, he retroactively looks like a caricature of a disgruntled Vietnam vet. He’s got the shaggy hair, beard, eye-patch, missing limb, and he’s sick of this shit! Thanks to countless other portrayals, like Gary Sinise’s Lt. Dan in Forrest Gump, it would be easy to dismiss Cutter at first glance. But Heard makes the character feel real, even if he amps it up to an extreme degree multiple times. There’s real pain in his eye, and he makes you understand his righteous anger with the world. Jeff Bridges and Lisa Eichhorn are great, as well, but this is Heard’s movie. 


Heard’s performance alone makes this worth watching, but its relevance stuck with me more than anything. Take out the 1970s of it all and Cutter’s rants still work. Capitalism has ruined a lot of things in this country, and justice is arguably the most important loss. Rich people seem to get away with everything, even murder, while the lowly regular people suffer, and there’s not much that can be done about it. Even when something drastic is done, it doesn’t change anything, and usually just leads to more suffering. We’re left with two choices: be like Cutter and let it consume you, or walk away like Bone (though even Bone can’t take it anymore in the end). Cutter’s monologue (though focused on Vietnam it can apply to any war or injustice) explains it so well in so few lines: “I watched the war on TV like everybody else. Thought the same damn things. You know what you thought when saw a picture of a young woman with a baby lying face down in a ditch, two gooks. You had three reactions, Rich, same as everybody else. The first one was real easy: ‘I hate the United States of America.’ Yeah. You see the same damn thing the next day, and you move up a notch. ‘There is no God.’ But you know what you finally say, what everybody finally says, no matter what? ‘I’m hungry.’”


Beyond that, this movie reminded me of two other films (though there are plenty of others to compare it to, I’m sure): Inherent Vice and The Big Lebowski. I connect this to Inherent Vice largely for the tone, but also for the slight ambiguity. The eerie score, while quite different from Vice’s, sets an apocalyptic tone signifying the end of an era or America or the idea of it anyway. And while there is a specific man they’re after in Cutter’s Way as opposed to the mostly faceless evil cabal of Inherent Vice, it’s still the same. We’re not sure if Cord has actually committed murder, but it doesn’t even matter. Anyone with that much money and power must have blood on his hands. Both films show the miserable conflict of knowing things are terrible, but also knowing there’s nothing that can be done beyond getting yourself killed on principle. 


The Big Lebowski is the more obvious, if tonally different, comparison. Of course, there’s Bridges; in both films he’s a reluctant participant in his Vietnam vet friend’s conspiracy quests. In many ways, I find Lebowski to simply be the light-hearted comedic version of this story. The world’s fucked, but fuck it, let’s go bowling. It’s as if the Coens watched this movie and took Cutter and Bone and found the most extreme comedic versions of both. In Bone, the go with the flow quasi-gigolo became the constantly stoned Dude, who just wants to be left alone. In Cutter, the darker elements have been stripped away leaving only the goofy diatribes that somehow connect Vietnam to everything. It’s not a one to one, and I don’t actually think the Coens were trying to make a version of this (from the title alone, they were more clearly going for a neo-noir comedy), but it’s impossible not to think of The Big Lebowski while watching Cutter’s Way and vice versa.


It may have taken me way too long to get around to watching Cutter’s Way, but it hit hard once I finally watched. I actually watched it twice within a couple days. This film stuck with me, and I’ll be thinking about it for a while. And thanks to Radiance’s new 4K, I’ll have a great version to check out when I inevitably revisit it after rewatching The Big Lebowski


Special Features and Transfer


This is the kind of movie 4K was meant for. Of course new movies will look great; they already look great on blu-ray. But when a film from decades ago gets the treatment, it adds another layer to enjoy, and this one looks great. 


As for the special features, Radiance is up there with all the other boutique labels. The artwork and case is high quality. And there’s a book included with essays and whatnot. 


There is just one new featurette with three writers (George Pelecanos, Megan Abbott, and Jordan Harper) mainly talking about the source novel and its author, Newton Thornburg. It was decent, and it gave me a few books to add to my ever-growing read list.


On the blu-ray (but not the 4K), there is an option to watch the original title sequence from when it was rightfully titled Cutter and Bone. It might seem trivial, but it’s just nice to see that title on the screen.


Everything else is archival, but what’s great about Radiance is that they go through all the other previous editions and bring all the features together on one release. So you get all the commentaries, featurettes, and interviews from past editions. I only checked out the interviews, and they each offered interesting insights into the making of the film.


Tuesday, May 29, 2018

Crappy Nic Cage Movies that Aren't Actually Crappy #3: "Snake Eyes"

AKA That movie with actor Kevin Dunn and a character named Kevin Dunne but not played by Kevin Dunn.

This is it (for a week). I’m done with Nicolas Cage. Snake Eyes marks the end of my Cage trilogy of movies most critics/people hate that I liked enough to buy. I think I’m going to lose some people with this one, mainly because of the Roger Ebert connection. With Knowing and 8MM, Ebert was on my side, praising the films even more than I do. But with Snake Eyes, I lost him. He hated this movie, mainly because Brian De Palma made it. It’s not that he disliked De Palma, quite the opposite. It’s that De Palma is so talented that such a misfire is doubly disappointing because of the missed opportunity (oddly enough, at 40%, it’s the best reviewed of the trilogy on Rotten Tomatoes). I would argue that De Palma did just fine with this film.

Sure, Snake Eyes will never be brought up with Blow Out, Scarface, Carrie, or The Untouchables (among many others), but I don’t think it’s the black mark on his career that many would have you believe (that would be Mission to Mars [although on second thought, was that as bad as I remember...nope, not going there]). It’s still a compelling conspiracy thriller with plenty of the trademark De Palma style. Plus, Cage gets to sleaze it up, which is always fun. Oh, and apparently a character was based on Donald Trump, so there’s a whole new way to look at this film.

As always, SPOILERS throughout.

The Gimmick

The most memorable aspect of Snake Eyes is that it takes place over the course of one night (nearly in real time) and replays multiple scenes from different perspectives with trademark De Palma camerawork and split screens.

I’m a fan of De Palma’s work, so it’s always interesting to see his style at play, but what works more for me with this film is the single night aspect. I’m not sure why, but stories that are contained within a single day or night interest me. Usually, you see a character change over the course of days, months, or even years. But in a movie like this the change occurs in a single night. Cage is put through a lot as he begins the night trying to help his buddy, the obviously evil Gary Sinise. He starts to take his job as a detective seriously, which unfortunately leads him to realize he’s been betrayed by his obviously evil buddy. And Cage goes from corrupt scumbag cop to decent man. Unrealistic? Yeah, but what a night!

The different perspectives put this one over the top, though. I don’t see how anyone can watch this and not at least appreciate the planning and skill that it took to film this. Not only do the same scenes need to be filmed from different angles, but De Palma also makes most of them long takes, adding to the complexity. I think if you ignore the story (which some will no doubt encourage you to do anyway) and look at this film on a technical level, it’s quite an accomplishment, gimmick or not. That’s enough to make this film worth watching. But there’s so much more.

Sleazy Cage - The Trilogy of Terrible Father Cage

When I went down the rabbit hole of Cage as a husband/father in 8MM, it occurred to me that this trilogy had a common theme: Nicolas Cage is a terrible father and/or husband. In Knowing, we can’t be sure what kind of husband he was before his wife died, but he has definitely checked out as a dad. You can’t be doing too hot as a parent if it’s a good thing that your kid is abducted by aliens at the end. In 8MM, he’s ridiculously absent. His wife is home with a baby, and he takes a months-long porno job as soon as he gets home from a weeks-long job. Chasing down snuff films is not a job for a family man. (By the way, I also own The Family Man, but I don’t know if I’ll ever write about it.) And in Snake Eyes, Cage is cheating on his wife and seems generally annoyed with his son. In fact, the longest conversation he has with his wife is about pizza toppings. It’s not weird for a character in these extreme situations to lose focus on family, but it is odd that it’s not focused on a bit more. At least he appears to have realized his faults at the end of the films, though he gets the promise of a date with Carla Gugino at the end of Snake Eyes, so that’s an odd bit of comeuppance for being a scumbag.
"So I'm Kevin Dunn, but you're playing Kevin Dunne?" "I think so, Gary." "No, you're Gary, I'm Kevin Dunn!" "I'm Kevin Dunne, you're...does your character have a name?" "No, I mean in real life, you're Gary Sinise." "No...we are all Kevin Dunne now..."

Kevin Dunn and Kevin Dunne

I’ve always been a weirdo about actors and knowing their roles. I always checked the credits at the end of movies as a kid to see the names of the actors (I loved it when movies showed a picture of the cast with their name at the end, like in Coming to America). When IMDb became a thing I was in Heaven.

So the first time I watched Snake Eyes, I noticed Kevin Dunn, a character actor I’ve always found amusing. No big deal, Kevin Dunn is in a lot of movies. But then Gary Sinise shows up as...Kevin Dunne. It threw me off at first. So Kevin Dunn is in this movie, and there’s also a character named Kevin Dunne, but Kevin Dunn isn’t playing Kevin Dunne. Huh?

I’m sure it’s one of those weird coincidences, but why didn’t they change the character’s name when they realized what was going on? You can imagine the confusion on the set. According to the trivia section of IMDb, this coincidence led to Kevin Dunn getting Gary Sinise’s hotel room, which was apparently nicer than the one Dunn was meant to have. If that’s true, it’s hilarious. Also, why isn’t Dunn getting put up in decent hotel rooms? He needs good rest as much as Sinise!

"My missile shaped hotel and casino is going to be the biggest, most tremendous, classiest missile-themed establishment ever made!"

Is this a prophetic analysis of the Trump-Russia scandal?

I’m not being too serious with this one, but I did read in the IMDb trivia section that John Heard’s character, Gilbert Powell, was based on Donald Trump. I don’t think it’s a stretch since the character owns a casino and hotel, but in the film he’s also an arms manufacturer with close ties to the Secretary of Defense. The who conspiracy of the movie is that he has the Secretary killed so his faulty missile defense system can be approved, making him enough to money to...build a hotel and casino in the shape of a missile. Yeah, this is based on Trump.

In all seriousness, this is much more fascinating now than it would have been in 1998, when the film was released. So you have Powell, who is manipulating politicians and international diplomacy for his own financial gain...hmm. And once Cage starts digging around, Powell spends the rest of the movie terrified at the idea of an investigation. Here are some elements and lines that fit this theory:

There’s the metaphorical, and literal, storm brewing the entire film, threatening to destroy everything, much like the Russia investigation might destroy the Presidency.

The Secretary of Defense says, “Bert Powell is out of his mind.” This is reminiscent to a number of reports of cabinet members saying similar things about Trump.

Powell at one point yells, “No humiliation, no scandal, no prison!” This could be a Trump tweet.

Someone says there could be “all sorts of indictments.”

It’s a loose connection, sure, but I still think it’s good enough to look into. Of course, the screenwriter had no idea what would eventually happen with Trump. This is just a great example of what can happen when you rewatch a random old movie you own.

Is it crappy?

Nope. As I stated above, this will never be listed among De Palma's best, but that doesn't make it a bad movie. Maybe everyone has the same issue Ebert had: they know De Palma could do better. But that isn't fair. You can't compare every film a director makes to their best work. If you did that, then every director would only have one good film, and everything else is a missed opportunity. That said, I didn't find this to be a missed opportunity. Perhaps the story and characters had flaws, but not enough for me to write this film off. I think De Palma made an entertaining, stylized thriller with his typical impressive camerawork.

Favorite Cage Moments

Cage is pretty cartoonish throughout jumping around and yelling, which is honestly a bit annoying, but when he gets serious he becomes bearable.

If you hated his character, you do get to see him get the shit beat out of him later, which is nice.

He still wears his high school class ring. Awesome.

It’s commented on, but his clothing is ridiculous. He looks like a homeless lounge singer.

Random Thoughts

The storm’s biggest impact was cut? Apparently there’s massive flooding and everything, but De Palma didn’t think it worked, so he scrapped it. There’s evidence in the final film, when Cage mentions, near the end, about being “back in the tunnel, under water.” That’s kind of crazy that such an expensive sequence was shot, and it’s not even included on the DVD.

Carla Gugino is Velma from Scooby Doo for most of this movie.

I wish Stan Shaw was playing the same boxer he played in Harlem Nights.

“There I am just minding my business, writing a letter to my lovely wife…”

The Secretary of Defense tells someone to bring him evidence of a faulty missile defense program at a fight? Or was that Gugino’s idea? I can’t remember. Either way, it’s a very dumb place to share that information.

Not exactly sure how Sinise gets the Palestinian to do his bidding…

Will Smith was courted for Sinise’s role. Makes no sense. Only four years difference with Cage, but in 1998, Cage looks ten years older, at least.

Is it really called Snake Eyes because of Sinise’s (and, later, Cage’s) line and the casino setting? Weak. It seems like the title should have more to do with a conspiracy or an assassination or even boxing. But I can't think of a good one, either.

The end credits reveal is odd, showing the jewelry the redhead was wearing in the column.