Directed by Ridley Scott, written by Jon Spaihts and Damon Lindelof, starring Noomi Rapace, Michael Fassbender, Logan Marshall-Green, Charlize Theron, and Idris Elba - Rated R
The main discussion concerning Prometheus is whether or
not the film is a prequel to Ridley Scott’s classic, Alien. The cast and crew have been vague about it,
at most admitting that there’s some Alien DNA in the film. I think they’ve been dodging the question not
because of spoilers but because of revenue.
If Prometheus had been billed up as a straight up sequel to an old
sci-fi film, then interest in it might lessen.
The big question, then, is if Prometheus can be enjoyed by someone who
has never seen Alien. The short answer
is yes. This film does stand on its
own. But only Alien fans can fully
enjoy it because no matter what the filmmakers have to say about it, this is a
prequel.
Prometheus is great without any prior knowledge, though,
because of the questions asked within the film.
The main question is the age-old question of humanity, “Why are we here?” That question takes on different variations
as the film continues, but it is that initial curiosity that sends the crew of
the titular spaceship Prometheus to a planet light years away from Earth to
investigate a message left by multiple ancient cultures. Asking a loaded question like “Why?” can make
or break a film because it has to deal with religion and science and how it can
co-exist. Not to go into spoilers, but
the film dodges the issue in a satisfying way.
But anytime an issue is dodged there will be complaints. Could Prometheus take a risk and answer the
question in a definitive and dividing way?
Yes, the film could have done that and made a small group of obsessed
fans (myself included, most like) extremely happy, but instead the filmmakers
left it open. That not only makes the
film more accessible for the population; it also allows the viewers discuss the
film.
That is what makes Prometheus truly great. I am writing this review twelve hours after I
watched the film and I am still rolling ideas around. If all my questions had been answered then I
would have very little to write about.
Instead, I am left with so many questions and theories that I can hardly
focus on just one. I find that exhilarating. I’m usually happy if a film simply makes me
feel something. When a movie makes me
think deeply about life: that’s special.
I realize that I have not given a proper synopsis for this
film yet, but I don’t intend to. Prometheus
is science-fiction and it’s about the origin of life. If that interests you (and it should), then
watch it. If that sounds like a bit too
much for you, then skip it.
But Prometheus is still a movie and should be judged as
other movies are judged. First, the
visuals. Sci-fi films are typically the
most impressive visual films and this movie does not disappoint. Director Ridley Scott insisted on using as
many natural landscapes and practical sets as possible and the film benefits
from it. The locations are otherworldly
and impressive because most of them are real.
The title sequence is so beautiful it seems like Werner Herzog or
Terrence Malick took over directorial duties for it. As for the sets: they were great. The ship looks polished a bit, but it still
fits into the technology of Alien in a very satisfying way.
Of course, a sci-fi film has to feature some CG
effects. It’s all handled very well,
though. The film is in 3D, as well, and
it is better because of it. Prometheus
is a visual spectacle and it should be presented in 3D. I have decided that all science-fiction films
should be in 3D because the vastness of space is best shown in the third dimension.
“Prometheus” also works thanks to the amazing cast. Noomi Rapace is tasked with the leading role
and she does a fine job. She doesn’t
make quite the tough heroine that Sigourney Weaver did in the Alien films,
but she certainly holds her own, especially late in the film. Idris Elba has some interesting scenes as the
benevolent captain of the ship, and there are a few questions raised by his
actions. Charlize Theron makes for an
effective and emotionless corporate minder.
Sean Harris provides some lively moments as a disgruntled geologist. And Logan Marshall-Green does fine in a
slightly boring role.
It’s Michael Fassbender, though, who steals the show as an
android named David. Who better than
Fassbender to play a robot? Not to
mention a robot that watches actors like Peter O’Toole and emulates them. Fassbender constantly propels the film and
every scene he is in is instantly better than those without him.
But the real star of the film is director Ridley Scott. I am a huge fan of his work, most notably his
sci-fi efforts, Alien and Blade Runner.
A lot has been made about Scott’s return to his best genre, so I don’t
need to add much to that discussion apart from saying that I am glad Scott is
back in sci-fi. He has always been an
ambitious filmmaker and sci-fi is the perfect place for lofty ideas and
questions. Scott has tried to insert
themes and ideas about life in general into recent works like Robin Hood and Kingdom
of Heaven to mixed results. The
vastness of space is a much better place to present ideas about humanity than
historical settings are.
It was also nice to see Scott return to the Alien universe
for both his style and his attempt to shock.
Scott emulates the style of the original film with his long tracking
shots throughout the ship. It’s pretty
much mimicking Kubrick, but who better to copy?
Also, Scott doesn’t turn the camera away when things get gory. Prometheus earns its R-rating (something
fans were worried about for a while) by featuring some truly gruesome
moments. Is anything as shocking or
iconic as the chest burst scene from the original? No, but it is definitely some disturbing,
cringe-worthy stuff.
Overall, Prometheus is an incredibly ambitious film made
with great style by one of the best working directors out there. The film doesn’t answer many questions for
the viewer and, honestly, a truly great film never tells the audience
much. Prometheus is an excellent film
to discuss and think about. Just check
out some message boards and you’ll find multiple complex debates going on about
this film. Even if you hate it, you have
to respect that it presents some interesting ideas about humanity, technology,
religion, abortion, faith, and…well, life.
It helps that the film is absolutely beautiful and features some great
performances. It’s my favorite film of
the year thus far and will certainly be near (or at) the top of my list by year’s
end.
Random Thoughts (SPOILERS)
Okay, I have a lot more to write about on this one. First: all the potential issues this film raises.
I loved that the question changed from the why of our origin into the why of our attempted annihilation. And I am okay with our why simply being because the Engineers could. It ties into our issues with technology. Why do we create a lot of the technology we have? Because we can and we want to make things better and better. In the world of the film, it is brought up in a very effective scene between David and Holloway. It is also extremely interesting when you factor in the timeframe when the Engineers decided to destroy humanity, which is roughly the time when Jesus walked the earth. Scott has made this reference himself in an interview, going so far as to say that Jesus may have been an Engineer (i.e. alien). But they strayed from that idea, for better or worse. (If you want to check the interview, just Google "Ridley Scott moviefone interview.")
Religion is definitely a major factor in the film, though it isn't given the main focus. It's more about faith and how someone can still believe after being put through trials and the answer given by Shaw is that she simply "chooses" to believe. Not a groundbreaking answer and really kind of a boring answer, but it doesn't make it any less logical and it is still a statement about belief systems.
The religion aspect is what I had in mind when I mentioned that Idris Elba's character, Janek, raises questions. It is almost out of nowhere, but Shaw talks to Janek near the end of the film as he was God. She asks how he can just sit back and watch horrible things happen without getting involved. If you think back before that scene, we get to see Janek watching over all of the characters and even though they appear to be in imminent danger, he is very nonchalant and even uncaring a bit. Kind of sounds like a certain deity who gets prayed to but seems to never intervene, right? Of course, this changes a bit when Janek decides to care at the end and basically saves humanity. So God was finally forced at act, basically. Hey, at least this deus ex machina didn't simply magically show up...
Now, looking into how the technology of this film matches up with Alien. An issue with a sci-fi prequel is that technology is better today so even though the film takes place before the original, the ship looks much better. This has been explained in an interview I read a few weeks ago (so I don't remember who said it), but the basic idea is that the Prometheus is filled with scientists, which explains why they would have all the bells and whistles that the Nostromo does not, since that ship was basically an 18-wheeler in space. Aside from that, the corridors still look similar and the ship does fit in nicely within the franchise.
Lastly, there is the issue of where this film takes place. At first, I just assumed this took place on the same planet that the first film took place on. That is not the case. This is a completely different planet, but it is very similar in that it is also used as a cache for the Engineers' deadly weapons. Presumably things went bad at all these locations which is why such a similar ship and issue occurred on an entirely different planet. I know, I know, wouldn't it have been much easier just to make it the same? Yes, but the story can go in more places if it isn't, so I'm cool with it. Plus, it still explains the origin of the Space Jockey in an interesting way. So Prometheus didn't end up being a true prequel, but it's still pretty damn close.
"Shaw talks to Janek near the end of the film as he was God. She asks how he can just sit back and watch horrible things happen without getting involved"
ReplyDeleteI love this. It never crossed my mind at the time. This makes me consider the idea of neccessary-intervention - about human dominance forcing the hand of God due to our weaknesses. And, I believe in this case, the outcome is not "the humans are great", its the opposite: the humans need to die. They deserve nothing.
Great write-up!
Thanks, I just had God on the mind as I was watching because of all the questions being asked. Really struck me when Shaw confronted him that he could be seen as the "captain" in an entirely different light. Definitely a movie that gives you a lot to think about.
DeleteThanks for reading!