Written and directed by Rian Johnson, starring Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Bruce Willis, Emily Blunt, and Jeff Daniels - Rated R
"This time travel crap just fries your brain like an egg..."
Time travel movies are fascinating…and can be mind-blowing. Wait, did I write, “mind-blowing”? I meant irritating. The concept can lead to fun, interesting, exciting, and gloriously complicated films, but it also makes your head hurt if you try to wrap your brain around every minute detail. (Don’t worry. I am not going to write a lengthy thesis about the ins and outs of time travel. Go to the message boards if you want to read theories written by the time travel “experts” that populate IMDb.) The films that use time travel to great success, like 12 Monkeys, The Terminator, or Back to the Future (to name a few), rarely waste much time with complicated plot points about time travel. Those films feature a lot of explanation, 12 Monkeys being the closest film that could be complicated. On the other end of the spectrum, you have films like Triangle, Timecrimes, and Primer. These films, while great and thought provoking, can almost feel like homework assignments when you stop and think about them. They become complicated because of all the alternate universes and timelines they create. You almost need to take notes to keep track of it all. (Sorry to the fans that find those films easy to follow. They just feel more like work than play to me.)
Time travel movies are fascinating…and can be mind-blowing. Wait, did I write, “mind-blowing”? I meant irritating. The concept can lead to fun, interesting, exciting, and gloriously complicated films, but it also makes your head hurt if you try to wrap your brain around every minute detail. (Don’t worry. I am not going to write a lengthy thesis about the ins and outs of time travel. Go to the message boards if you want to read theories written by the time travel “experts” that populate IMDb.) The films that use time travel to great success, like 12 Monkeys, The Terminator, or Back to the Future (to name a few), rarely waste much time with complicated plot points about time travel. Those films feature a lot of explanation, 12 Monkeys being the closest film that could be complicated. On the other end of the spectrum, you have films like Triangle, Timecrimes, and Primer. These films, while great and thought provoking, can almost feel like homework assignments when you stop and think about them. They become complicated because of all the alternate universes and timelines they create. You almost need to take notes to keep track of it all. (Sorry to the fans that find those films easy to follow. They just feel more like work than play to me.)
Looper, the latest from writer/director Rian Johnson,
thankfully falls in the former group. It
is an interesting, entertaining sci-fi movie that doesn’t get bogged down with
the rules of time travel. That is not to
say that this is a simple film. It is
still about time travel and it still contains a paradox or two. But if we’re willing to forgive The
Terminator its paradox (sorry, I don’t buy any theories about how it is
possible for John Connor to send his own father back in time to become his
father) because of its awesomeness, then we should do the same for
Looper.
Looper is a great movie for many reasons, Rian Johnson
being number one. He has crafted such an
interesting story. In the relatively
near future, time travel has yet to be invented, but it will be thirty years
later. Since it is impossible to get
away with murder in the future, crime lords will use time travel to send
undesirables into the past to be taken care of by hit men, or loopers. Eventually, since time travel is so illegal
in the future (and to protect the criminals’ own interests), a looper must
close his own loop. This means he must
eventually kill his own older self. All
of their marks show up hooded, so a looper doesn’t know he has essentially
killed himself until after the job is done.
Enter Joe (Joseph Gordon-Levitt), an addict (he's addicted
to some future drug taken in the form of eye drops) who quietly goes about his
business in the hopes of saving up plenty and eventually having a happy
retirement. Things go awry when Joe has
to close his own loop. His older self,
or Old Joe, shows up without his hood on.
Being face to face with his older self (Bruce Willis) startles Joe,
giving Old Joe enough time to distract Joe and get away. Someone from the future being loose in the
past is a huge problem for the mob, so young Joe must stop Old Joe no matter
what.
What makes the plot of Looper more interesting is that Old
Joe doesn't run simply because he wants to live longer. He's there to kill the child version of the
future's evil overlord. I think it makes
the film more interesting because it takes the common time travel scenario of
going back in time to kill someone like, oh, let's go with the mainstay,
Hitler, but adding the problem of said Hitler-type being a child. You start to rethink things once you see a
gun pointed at a child who has done nothing wrong...yet. The moral implications of Old Joe's plan
fascinated me and Willis did a fine job of showing steely reserve as he
contemplated murder.
Bruce Willis is right at home in a sci-fi film (he's even
done the time travel thing a time or two, as well), and his scenes with Young
Joe discussing time travel are great. At
one point it's almost as if he's predicting the internet message board arguments
by yelling at Joe and telling him to forget about the time travel crap. I'm with him on that; just enjoy the
show.
Joseph Gordon-Levitt makes it very easy to enjoy this
film. The first thing you notice is how
different he looks in this film because they put makeup and prosthetics on his
face to make look more like a young Bruce Willis. The true joy of his performance, though,
comes through his mannerisms. His
constant squint, that bark of a laugh; it's a great performance and it makes
the film a lot of fun. I only wish they
shared more screen time.
The rest of the cast is well-rounded. Jeff Daniels plays a somewhat disinterested
future immigrant in an interesting way.
Paul Dano is in his wheelhouse playing a nervous, stuttering
looper. Emily Blunt is does okay as a
single mom on a farm. Garrett Dillahunt
has a great, tense scene. And Pierce
Gagnon is admirable if for no other reason than he is a child actor in a sci-fi
film and he isn't annoying at all. Kudos
to the marketing team behind this film completely leaving the child out of the
previews even though it is a vital part of the film. I'm serious, this film probably did better
because people were unaware that a child factored into the plot.
Speaking of marketing, this film is being touted as one of
the “best action films” of the year. But
it's not really an action movie. The few
action scenes are great, though. Willis's
big action scene might go down as one of the best of his career, and that is
certainly saying something.
But Looper is not an action movie. It's a sci-fi/time travel movie. There's a great future world created with
very few answers to any questions that might arise (and that's the way it
should be, most of the time, in sci-fi).
There is a multiple time line aspect to the film, but it is handled in a
very clear and stylish way. In fact, the
film is flat out stylish and it works on nearly every level. I was left with only one issue with Rian
Johnson's great film: I wanted more. I
wanted to see more of the world, I wanted more of the future world Bruce Willis
came from, I wanted more one-on-one scenes with Gordon-Levitt and Willis,
etc. If the only issue you have with a
film is that you wish there was more of it, then that is a good problem to
have. Check out Looper. It might not be one of the best “action”
movies of the year, but it is one of the best movies of the year.
No comments:
Post a Comment