Showing posts with label Jon Polito. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jon Polito. Show all posts

Sunday, September 7, 2025

The Man Who Wasn't There - The One and Only Coen Commentary


I own almost every Coen Brothers movie on physical media, and something that is immediately clear is that they are not very interested in talking about their movies. They show up for the occasional special feature interview (mostly for the Criterion releases of their films [Blood Simple, Miller’s Crossing, No Country for Old Men, and Inside Llewyn Davis]), but for the most part, they leave their movies to the viewers. So a director’s commentary is most likely out of the question. In fact, it’s so abhorrent to them that for the DVD release of Blood Simple they made up a film historian character and wrote a script for him for the commentary. That’s a lot of work to get around having to talk about your own movie. After that, there’s just the Roger Deakins commentary on the Fargo disc. So imagine my shock when I saw that there was a commentary for The Man Who Wasn’t There featuring Joel and Ethan and star Billy Bob Thornton. To date, it’s their only commentary. So I felt it necessary to check out, along with the other special features, and report on. But before I get into that, I wanted to share my personal interpretation of this forgotten, beautiful Coen Brothers film.

UFOs and Gullibility


Thornton’s Ed Crane is one of the quietest characters in film history. Without his narration, he comes across as nearly mute. Silent characters, and people in general, are sometimes perceived as smarter than the “gabbers” (as Ed calls chatty people). But I’ve always taken issue with this. It’s an asset to hold your tongue when you don’t have anything to say, sure, but that doesn’t mean you’re automatically some deep, philosophical type. Ed, however, fancies himself as such. But I disagree.


While Ed might seem to be a bit smarter than all the people chattering away around him, he actually buys into a lot of bullshit and makes plenty of mistakes. In his defense, everything he does is part of his quest to find meaning in life, but he’s too gullible about it. 


Ed buying into the dry cleaning scheme sets everything in motion. Jon Polito isn’t even selling him on it that hard. He’s just another customer gabbing away during a haircut. But something about this futuristic new laundry method sparks something in Ed. Knowing his wife, Doris, was cheating on him didn’t spark anything, but dry cleaning did. 


It’s impossible to know if the dry cleaning investment was a scam since Big Dave killed Polito. But regardless of that, it’s still a foolhardy investment that upends Ed’s world all done over a traveling salesman’s soft pitch in a barber’s chair. 


The events set in motion by that investment through blackmailing lead to Ed killing Dave, and Doris killing herself in jail. But none of this brings him meaning, and he seems to just be drifting through everything. Two things snap him out of it: Birdy (Scarlett Johansson) and Ann Nirdlinger (Katherin Borowitz). 


Birdy playing the piano skillfully sparks something again in Ed. He thinks he’s witnessing a prodigy that her drunk father (a great Richard Jenkins) is oblivious to. Ed takes it upon himself to take Birdy to music teacher, who breaks Ed’s spirit by explaining that Birdy is certainly capable, but she lacks the heart to make a musician. Ed is further crestfallen when Birdy admits that she doesn’t even care that much about music, and things literally spiral out of control when Birdy misinterprets Ed’s attention as sexual in nature and attempts to give him blowjob on the ride home, leading to a car wreck.



After the car crashes, a hubcap that looks like a flying saucer rolls along the road, bringing us to Ed’s final attempt to find meaning. The UFO stuff can appear as some Coen randomness on a first watch, but of course it’s more than that. It’s first brought to Ed’s attention when Ann, looking straight out of Plan 9 from Outer Space, shows up to tell Ed that she knows Dave’s death was all about an alien encounter they had while camping a year before. At first, Ed, rightfully, thinks Ann is having a breakdown over Dave’s death, but the seed is planted.


Once Ed is put on death row, his need for meaning brings back the UFOs. He has a dream in prison in which a UFO shows up. He goes out into the yard, sees the spotlight of the UFO, then it just leaves him there rather than saving him from prison and showing him another world than the one he knows. Ed then goes to his death, staring at haircuts and wondering what will come next, if anything. If not for Ann, he wouldn’t have even considered the possibility of aliens. 


Just before his death, however, there is a seemingly mundane flashback. A tarmacadam salesman (Shooter McGavin himself, Christopher McDonald) approaches Ed, going into his spiel. Ed doesn’t seem too interested, but he’s also not getting rid of the guy. Then Doris pulls up, immediately rips up the salesman’s pamphlet and sends him on his way. As she walks past Ed, she seems disgusted that he had let the salesman get that far. Inside, they sit silently until Ed starts to try to say something, and Doris stops him. This is their marriage, and this is how Ed has been kept in check all these years. 


This scene, or variations of it, has probably happened dozens of times in their marriage. Some salesman or con artist approaches silent Ed, then Doris swoops in to stop it. Without Doris to stop Ed with the dry cleaning plan, everything fell apart. Doris knew that Ed was gullible and couldn’t help himself when someone approached him with something new and seemingly meaningful.


Ed is definitely a deep thinker, as evidenced by the hilarious “You ever wonder about it?” conversation he attempts to have about how hair just keeps growing. But as Freddy Reidenschneider (the always great Tony Shalhoub) points out, paraphrasing Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle: “The more you look, the less you really know.”


Trying to find meaning in life may seem like the smart thing to do, especially in the face of constant nonsensical chatter. But the more you search for meaning, the less you find as you miss what’s right in front of you. I’m not saying the film is suggesting that Ed just needed to pay more attention to his wife (though that would have prevented a few deaths). But it’s certainly suggesting that searching for meaning is pointless and, in fact, destructive, especially when you’re gullible enough to try to find meaning anytime someone approaches you with something as banal as dry cleaning. 



Special Features


Aside from the commentary, there are deleted scenes, an extended interview with Roger Deakins, and a behind-the-scenes featurette.


The deleted scenes are hilarious. One is just Shalhoub’s opening argument minus the Thornton narration.


The rest are three haircuts given their own listing as a “scene”: the Timberline, the Duck Butt, and the Alpine Rope Toss. Literally each one is a three second shot of a haircut.


Then there's the pivotal “Doris’ [sic] Salad,” which is a shot of a wedge salad being placed on a plate. 


When shit like this happens on one of their physical releases, I assume it's a joke, then there’s this line from the behind the scenes featurette from Ethan Coen: “The whole barber thing was really just a backdrop. The story didn't sort of catch fire [Joel starts laughing next to him] until we added the dry-cleaning to the mix. Then we knew we had something we could take and pitch to all the studios.”


These guys will do interviews and whatnot, but they’re going to drop in some deadpan jokes like that.



The One and Only Commentary


It’s shocking how normal of a commentary it is. Though it does have the rare problem of the film being a little too loud making it hard to hear the commentary at times. I was hoping for a full on performance featuring clearly made up stories and jokes. But it’s pretty straightforward. It is nice to watch a movie along with them, because you hear them crack up at their own movie, and it’s infectious. Watching this with the commentary definitely made me see this as more of a comedy. Aside from that, here are some highlights I came across:


Billy Bob Thornton claims he was smoking real unfiltered cigarettes during the shoot, then he would go to his trailer and smoke more, and he even smoked while doing the voiceover sessions. He claims this experience helped make him quit smoking. Though I don’t know it it stuck or not.


They joke about making an Ed Crane talk show 


The soldier being eaten by the Japanese story came from Barry Sonnenfeld's dad. No telling how long they were sitting on that one. 


“I love the dialogue you guys wrote for this movie.” - Billy Bob

“None of it for you!” - Joel, I think


Good for Billy Bob remembering that Abraham Benrubi was also in U Turn.


There was a deleted scene (unfilmed) in which Ed, the night he kills Dave, wakes up to a flying saucer being outside and tiny ant-like aliens come out. They opted for the Ann UFO story. If they had gone with this route, then my gullibility theory goes right out the window. Its existence even as a deleted scene still messes with it, I guess, but I’ve always found that movies can have multiple interpretations, so I’m sticking with it.


Ethan says they did a take of the police officers telling Ed about Doris being arrested in which “Ed fled the interview.” I just like that he used the same terminology as in Fargo.


This commentary was recorded on January 8, 2002. I know this because Thornton mentions that Dave Thomas died that morning.


Thornton fluffed his pants up to make it look like he had an erection while watching Birdy play the piano.


The commentary loses some steam in the back half, with multiple moments of them just watching the movie. You even hear them shuffling around in their seats during these quiet moments.


But it picks up during the credits with Billy Bob claiming he met Roderick Jaynes, the Coens’ fake editor. The Coens play along, referring to Jaynes as kind of a rough character.


They finish talking about a dude interviewing them at Cannes named Guy Pines, but “Pines” is pronounced “penis,” and how ridiculous it is to go with that pronunciation.


Thursday, July 31, 2025

Miller's Crossing - "Jesus, Tom!"

My favorite films of all time all share one quality: they can be studied deeply and have numerous theories applied to them, or you can shut your brain off and just enjoy the world of the film. And both styles of viewing are equally enjoyable. Miller’s Crossing is one of those films, making it one of my favorite Coen Brothers movies, possibly my overall favorite (I’ll post my ranking once I get to the end of their filmography in a few months). Most of the films in the Coen filmography can be viewed this way, but what sets Miller’s Crossing apart is that it almost dares you to analyze it.

“Jesus, Tom!”


The phrase “Jesus, Tom” is said eight times in the film (seven, if you’re watching the Criterion cut), along with a single utterance each for “Tom, Jesus,” and “Christ, Tom” along with countless variations of “Jesus” as an exclamation. It happens too many times to be ignored. Much like the focus on hats, it begs you to find meaning, even if the Coens don’t necessarily mean anything by it. 


For the record, I don’t buy their bullshit in interviews when they claim most of their potentially symbolic elements are just random. But I also don’t like filmmakers flat out telling audiences what things mean, so good for them. There’s probably a more solid theory to be worked out with the hats along the lines of them representing order and control. But the hat stuff never interested me that much. Tom as Jesus on the other hand…


Like most theories applied to Coen films, this isn’t clear cut or perfect by any means. This is not a one to one story of Christ. But the dialogue and Tom’s sacrifice for Leo make it worth thinking about. 


I don’t find Tom all that Christ-like beyond taking on other people’s problems and “saving” them. Instead, I like to think of Tom as Jesus if Jesus Christ was kind of a dick who didn’t give a shit. Tom is a bit of a drunken smartass asshole throughout the film, but you still root for him because he still seems better than those around him. It’s as if this world operates on a set course and only Tom’s actions can alter that course.


Tom is a selfless person, but not in a holy way. He’s self-destructive with his drinking and gambling, and though others offer to save him throughout the film, he insists on taking care of things himself, even if it means taking a beating or even dying. 


So when Leo sets a course for destruction by protecting Bernie, Tom realizes he must ruin his relationship with Leo (and Verna) to save Leo. But he doesn’t do this in a kind savior way. He’s a dick about it, because it’s annoying to him. He knows there are beatings in the future, all because Leo fell in love.


When Leo pronounced his love for Verna, Tom knew he could not salvage his friendship. First off, he’s in a relationship of his own with Verna, which is bad enough. But he also wants Leo to be happy more than he wants happiness for himself. 


You would think committing adultery would be enough to discredit a Jesus theory, but Tom is also a murderer. Killing Bernie might appear to be a cold-blooded moment of revenge for Tom, and it most likely is to a degree, but it’s also what saves Leo and Verna’s relationship. Tom knows there’s no going back to Verna after killing her brother. She’s now free to return to Leo, who Tom knew would always take her back because he’s a sap.  


Between all the supposed or real double crosses and the affair and the murder, Tom has created an untenable situation. By the time the smoke clears, his actions have led to Leo being back on top with no real threats, but he can’t be a part of it. Like Jesus, now that his mission of salvation is complete, it’s time to move on.


Obviously, it’s easy to poke holes in this theory, but it’s fun to think about it when you’ve watched a movie a dozen times and want to add new meaning to it. I still prefer to let the music of the dialogue of Miller’s Crossing wash over me (it’s really hard not to ask people “What’s the rumpus?” after watching this) rather than do the homework of counting how many times a character says “Jesus.” And the Coens would probably utterly dismiss any comparison between Jesus and Tom. But they know what they’re doing when they put that phrase in the script so many times. It’s there for humor (especially when they have Steve Buscemi say it), but they also like laying little theory traps in their movies for dorks like me, and I’ll gladly take the bait from time to time. And other times, I’ll just “let it drift.” With the Coens, both options are great.



Random Thoughts / Favorite Quotes


It is absolutely insane that Jon Polito was 38 when they filmed this. I would've guessed 50 at the youngest. In fact, Gabriel Byrne was born six months earlier than Polito, yet Polito calls him “kid” multiple times. He’s an all time young old dude.


“Youse fancy pants, all of youse.”


“Friends is a mental state.”


J. E. Freeman is giving an all-time sneering performance in this.


I always liked the Vinny Vedecci skits on SNL in which Bill Hader as Vedecci would interview celebrities for his Italian talk show but the guests don’t speak Italian. Every skit would include a moment when Vedecci’s son, played by Bobby Moynihan would interrupt, dressed in an old-timey sailor outfit. He asks a question and the guest’s response makes him cry, and Vedecci has to calm him down with cigarettes and wine. It’s random as shit, unless you’ve seen Miller’s Crossing. Johnny Caspar’s son first appears in a sailor outfit, and later in the film Caspar hits him, causing him to have a crying fit (though he doesn’t give him a cigarette or wine). Hader, a known cinephile, clearly decided to pay homage to Caspar’s son in the Vedecci skit. He’s never acknowledged it in any interview that I could find, though Moynihan’s Wikipedia page states that the character is based on Caspar’s son, but there isn’t a citation for this. Either way, I think it’s pretty clear that this is the source of the SNL character. It’s just one of those great, random things Hader injected into his comedy.


Mike Starr really looks like his feelings are hurt after Tom hits him with the chair. His “Jesus, Tom,” is the best in the film, and it’s crazy that the Coens cut it out of the Criterion version of the film. I’m fine, I guess, with them “tightening things up” or whatever with these releases, but cutting that line baffles me.


“You got a lip on you. That’s all right. I don’t generally care for it. But that’s all right.”


“I forgive you.”

“I didn’t ask for that, and I don’t want it.”


This film presents the violence of gangster films so commonplace that it’s comedic. First, characters just treat it as part of the life, as evidenced by Tom and O’Doyle’s reaction to gunfire erupting during the raid on Caspar’s club. They don’t duck and cover; they just shrug it off as the typical bullshit you deal with in this world. 


Then there’s the attempted hit on Leo, in which he’s granted infinite ammo when he retaliates. If the amount of ammo wasn’t a clear indicator of the humor, then the way the goon dies in the window should solidify it as he goes all herky-jerky and shoots a complete circle around himself (including his own toes). And there’s the Sam Raimi cameo with the twitching body and the ridiculous firepower in that scene which rivals something out of a Naked Gun movie. 


The treatment of violence in Miller’s Crossing as both brutal and comic is one of the many reasons why I love it. The Coens have this rare ability to ride this line between sincere gangster noir and a parody of it. It’s a bit of having your cake and eating it, too, but why the fuck shouldn’t you eat cake if you have it? That saying is stupid as shit, as is the criticism it implies.