Showing posts with label Laura Dern. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Laura Dern. Show all posts

Monday, June 13, 2022

Jurrasic World: Dominion - "Jurassic World? Not a Fan."



The Jurassic franchise has never meant all that much to me (as evidenced by my claim of Jurassic World being my favorite movie in the series a few years ago). I don’t hold the original film sacred, and I never even watched the third one (but does watching that clip of the talking dinosaur a hundred times on YouTube count?).In other words, I’m easy to please with this dinosaur shit. I didn’t even hate Fallen Kingdom, though I found it pretty boring. But the end of that film promised a world overrun with dinosaurs, and I thought, “Well, at least that next one will be badass.” Holy fuck was I wrong.


To be fair, my expectations are largely to blame here. I wanted to see a Roland Emmerich-type disaster movie with dinosaurs instead of aliens and natural disasters. I wanted raptors in the streets of New York. Pterodactyls bringing air travel to a halt as they reclaimed the sky. A T. Rex fucking up a baseball stadium or something. You know, some real cinematic shit. Instead, it’s glossed over in the intro that dinosaurs are just part of the world now, and the main issue isn’t that DINOSAURS ARE ROAMING THE FUCKING PLANET, it’s that there’s a corporation tinkering with the dino technology to control crops (which is only slightly more interesting than the Quantum of Solace villain’s plan to control the water of Bolivia). 


The James Bond movie reference is fitting because this movie really wants to be one for some reason. It’s a good thing that pterodactyls are cool with commercial flight because the characters in this movie are constantly flying around until they end up in a Bond villain-esque compound at the end. The movie is way too busy trying to explain why the characters from the new films will end up in the same place as the characters from the old films. This inevitable meet-up of two different generations is meant to be some awesome moment of nostalgia and current pop culture, but I just didn’t care. 


At first, I thought I didn’t care because I’m just not that into this series. That may slightly be the case, but there’s also the issue with an utter lack of character development aside from all the good guys wanting to stop the bad guy. The new characters are after their adopted clone daughter and a baby raptor, so I guess there’s a chance at some emotional attachment there for some audience members. But the characters from the first films are just there to wear their costumes that audiences will recognize. 


But who cares about the people because this is a dinosaur movie. But it isn’t, really. The dinosaurs are presented as a normal part of the world, so gone are the scenes reveling in the awesomeness of the creatures. There’s a chase sequence in the middle of the film with raptors, and you forget that dinosaurs are even a factor in it until the end when Chris Pratt holds his hand up like a dildo trying to use the Force. And even when the new giant killer dinosaur finally gets to fuck shit up, literally every scene is in the dark. In a series that is only popular because of spectacle, this film is oddly devoid of it. I get that six films in, it’s hard to get excited about dinosaurs. If these assholes have the nerve to keep cashing in on the nostalgia of dino lovers around the world, then they should at least try to justify the existence of their movie. 


It’s as if even the characters in the film don’t know why it exists. So many times characters look at each quizzically and ask, “What?” I’m starting to wonder if those were outtakes that got left in. Even the villain seems confused about everything. A very aloof Campbell Scott plays a Big Lots version of Steve Job whose only villainous trait seems to be a complete disconnect with humanity to the point that he can’t hold a full conversation with anyone. There’s a scene in which BD Wong (hey, he’s been in the other movies!) explains why they need the cloned girl, and Scott (rightfully) points out that maybe they shouldn’t just let her hang out in the lab. She immediately then escapes and is able to even break out the baby raptor on the way. It’s like Scott is still learning how to be a villain, and his heart really isn’t in it. 


And that’s the feeling I took away from the whole movie. No one seemed to care at any point. They know any movie with Jurassic in the title is going to make a fuckton of money, so why try? Just throw together some action sequences and make sure all the characters meet up at the end. And maybe that’s all some audience members want: let me see some familiar faces and some dinosaurs. But as an audience member I set the bar pretty low for myself, and I still came away very bored and disappointed. At least they claim this is it…for now. But like the character who always wears a black leather jacket for some reason said in one of these: “Life finds a way.” Well, when life finds its way back to this series in a decade or so, hopefully someone finds a way to make it interesting.


Random Thoughts


Every time Pratt held up his hand like a Jedi was so fucking stupid. I get that he did that in the other movies, but that was with dinosaurs he had been working with for years. It’s not every random-ass dino knows what the fuck he’s doing with his hand. And when he did it at the same time as Alan, the movie presents it like this amazing moment of two worlds coming together, but I found it so stupid-looking that I laughed.


Dinosaurs are so normalized in this movie that they bring home the baby raptor in a fucking dog crate that I would use for my tiny Bichon. 


So at one point in the film, a random evil lady has some dinosaurs that will attack people at her command. This works by her pointing a laser pointer thing at a person. If you have to be close enough to the person to point something at them to make it work, then wouldn’t you just fucking shoot that person instead of siccing a goddamn dinosaur on them? But I guess this is in keeping with the James Bond theme, because only a Dr. Evil-type motherfucker would have any use for such a stupid dinosaur.


The globe-trotting aspect of this movie is distracting. Laura Dern goes from Iowa (or maybe Oklahoma) to Utah (or maybe Nevada) to meet up with Sam Niell. Then they are suddenly in Pennsylvania…to get on a plane. And when the plane lands, they have to get in a helicopter. What the fuck is going on here?


Everyone is still way too underwhelmed with the fact that human cloning is now possible. Seriously, a human clone exists, and their main takeaway is that they can bio-engineer locusts with her DNA?


About those locusts. They seem designed to destroy any crops not grown with Biosyn seeds. But BD Wong and Big Lots Steve Jobs act like the locusts aren’t doing what they planned. So the villain is accidentally doing villainous shit. If he didn’t want to control the food supply, then what was the plan with the locusts? And is all this the film’s lazy way of condemning GMOs or something? Like everything with this movie, it feels like half a thought that they forgot to finish but kept in anyway.


Back to the pterodactyls. So when they disable the magic defense system at the compound, the pterodactyls immediately attack anything in the sky. So why is this not happening throughout the rest of the world? The movie makes it painfully clear that air travel is still possible. So the pterodactyls elsewhere are just cool with planes, but the ones at the compound hate them?


Why the fuck did the writers just decide to skip over all this kind of shit? I just think there’s a fantastically interesting and entertaining movie about what the world is like when the dinosaurs first make their way back to the rest of the planet. 


Ugh. Fuck this movie.

Friday, July 31, 2020

Wild at Heart - "This Whole World's Wild at Heart and Weird on Top."

Wild at Heart, David Lynch’s surreal (what Lynch isn’t surreal except for the aptly titled Straight Story?) Bonnie and Clyde meets Wizard of Oz mash up, is one of my favorite Lynch films. I dig the simplicity of the plot (Sailor [Nicolas Cage] and Lula [Laura Dern] attempt to be together despite jail stints and Lula’s psychotic mother plotting against them with assassins and whatnot). But more than anything, I enjoy the constant movement necessary for a road movie because Lynch never has time to slow down and wallow in the weirdness, and neither does the audience. You’re forced to just go with it, and if you can embrace that, which I did, then it ends being Lynch’s most enjoyable (not necessarily best) film. I bought Wild at Heart a while back and never got around to watching it. After revisiting Lost Highway a few weeks ago, I figured it was time to watch this crazy movie again. Here are my thoughts.  


The Film That Fixed, or Broke, Nicolas Cage

I’ve written more than enough about Nicolas Cage over the years, and at this point it’s become a bit of a cliché to celebrate the craziness of the eccentric actor. Everyone gets it: Cage is crazy, great, terrible, etc. Obviously, I’m a fan, and I do think of him as endlessly entertaining, even when he swings and misses. But when he swings and connects, it’s something very special. Wild at Heart is one of those connections.

At first, I was just going to focus on how David Lynch and Cage are perfect for each other because they’re both so weird, but that’s a bit too obvious. I don’t think I’d be breaking new ground by claiming these two dudes are on the strange side. So I wasn’t going to write about Cage’s performance much at all aside from pointing out a few moments I particularly enjoyed. Then I came across this bit of IMDb trivia: Nic Cage states that Wild at Heart helped him get away from method acting. David Lynch's spontaneous re-writes and the film's odd characters helped him be more playful with acting.

If that bit of trivia is true (for the sake of this article, I’m going to say it is, but I have not come across this fact anywhere else and, actually, the behind-the-scenes stuff I saw brought up how he stayed in character on set, but oh well...), then Wild at Heart is the film that broke, or fixed, Cage. Cage’s method acting had already produced a few great performances (Raising Arizona and Vampire’s Kiss are my favorites leading up to Wild at Heart), but it wasn’t until this movie that you start to see roles in which it seems like Cage is willing to change things up with the characters he portrays. That’s not to say that he didn’t bring something to the parts he played, he obviously did, especially with Vampire’s Kiss. But with Wild at Heart, he was allowed to deviate from the character on the page. 

The best example of this is the inclusion of the snakeskin jacket Cage wears. He asked Lynch if he could wear it in the film, and then it became this recurring element in the movie. It’s not a coincidence that Cage’s line associated with the jacket concerns “individuality” and “personal freedom.” By wearing the jacket in this film, Cage was freed to start altering his roles in the future, for better or worse. 

Certainly part of the reason Cage was/is allowed to do whatever he wants at times is because of his undulating star power. But I think the bigger part is that directors see the value in letting Cage have a bit of freedom. Because of this freedom, we not only get exaggerated moments in big films (his moment dressed as a priest in Face/Off comes to mind), but we also get performances like Deadfall, which feel like complete Cage creations. 

Cage’s performance in Deadfall is why his change after Wild at Heart could be seen as both breaking and fixing him. For me, it fixed him and allowed for his greatest, most entertaining work. For others, his eccentric performances might come across as distracting, over-the-top disasters that ruin the movie. I feel sorry for anyone who feels the latter. I’m glad Cage put on that literal and figurative snakeskin jacket, and I hope he never takes it off. 


Embracing the Oddness

This is only the second time I have seen Wild at Heart, and I had forgotten how darkly funny and wacky this movie was. I found myself simply enjoying the film, which is odd for me, as I tend to try to decipher David Lynch movies.

Normally, the Random Thoughts section for any movie, but especially a David Lynch movie, would be the longest section. But when I got to the end of Wild at Heart, I realized I didn’t stop very often to make note of what was happening while I was watching. I couldn’t believe I had so few random thoughts about this batshit crazy Wizard of Oz sexual fever dream. I think the all out assault of weird shit throughout the film was too much for me to stop and dwell on any of it. I mean, we’re talking about a movie in which a contract killer manager(?) takes a phone call while sitting on the toilet, drinking tea, and watching a nearly naked woman dance for him. When that’s going on in what should be a simple scene, I just can’t stop to try to decipher any of it because by the time I start to have a thought, something else even wackier happens. And that’s why I love this movie. It’s Lynch unhinged just doing whatever the fuck he wants, and I enjoy the film by just embracing the oddness of it rather than allowing myself to be distracted by it.

It’s one of the only weird Lynch movies that I can just turn my brain off and enjoy. I don’t feel the need to “figure” it out. I think it’s his most simply entertaining film, even with it being one of the weirdest at the same time. Even with all the Wizard of Oz stuff, I didn’t feel the need to try to assign each character to their Oz counterpart. It’s just a movie that is heavily influenced by that film to the point that it’s kind of a new, weirder and more adult version of that film.

The fact that this is a kind of version of Wizard of Oz means that the film has to be constantly moving. There’s not much time for Lynch to dwell on anything, no matter how strange and interesting it might be. Wild at Heart comes at you fast, and the two hour run time feels like an hour at most. Because of this, it wasn’t until it was over that I had time to gather my thoughts and consider some of the crazy shit going on in this movie. I wanted to list some of my favorite weird moments:

  • Harry Dean Stanton watching a nature show and growling and shit.
  • The mom covering herself in lipstick.
  • The constant heavy metal riff segue.
  • “Fucking field, let’s dance!”
  • Willem Dafoe’s fucking teeth.
  • Laura Dern just puking on the floor and leaving it.
  • Crispin Glover as Cousin Dell...there’s too much going on it that sequence to narrow it down but here goes: dressing as Santa in the middle of the year, living in fear of aliens wearing black rubber gloves, making a hundred sandwiches, putting cockroaches in his underwear and...on his anus, and then disappearing.
  • There are plenty of references to Wizard of Oz throughout (with characters even talking about the movie multiple times), but things get truly crazy when Glenda the Good Witch shows up at the end to teach Sailor to embrace love.

And those are just what come to mind right now. I feel like I could make a list like this after each viewing, and it would be totally different. Wild at Heart is the fucked up movie that keeps on giving.

Why Do I Own This?

I buy any David Lynch movie that even remotely interests me because I know I’ll need to see it multiple times to truly appreciate it. I need to watch this one a few more times in the future.


Random Thoughts

Laura Dern always impresses me in her Lynch films. She just seems so at home in her roles, which is incredibly impressive when comparing this role to her part in Blue Velvet. She is convincing as both an innocent all-American small town girl and as an over-sexed Dorothy. I’m glad she finally won an Oscar for Marriage Story, but she deserved one at least thirty years ago.

A good triple feature would be this movie with Raising Arizona and Natural Born Killers. Of course, I’d need a lobotomy after watching all three of those in one day, but the experience would be worth it.

That is quite a beating to start a film. It definitely sets the tone for this fucked up story.

"My snakeskin jacket! Thanks, baby! Did I ever tell you that this here jacket represents a symbol of my individuality and my belief in personal freedom?" 
I feel like Cage has said this in his everyday life as well.

...and according to IMDb trivia the jacket was actually Cage's and he asked if he could wear it in the movie.

"Sounds like old Dell was more than just a little bit confused, Peanut."

"Lordy, what was that all about?" I think that could be the tagline for almost every Lynch movie.

Bobby Peru is the skeeziest character Willem Dafoe has ever played, and that's fucking saying something.

..