Showing posts with label Emma Stone. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Emma Stone. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 31, 2025

Bugonia - "Sometimes a Species Just Winds Down."

SPOILERS because this has been on VOD for weeks, and now it’s on Peacock. Also, I mainly want to write about the ending.

Yorgos Lanthimos speaks my language. With Poor Things, I realized he was the closest thing to Kubrick we have today. That’s not to say he’s copying Kubrick’s style (though there are certainly similarities), it’s more about his regard to humanity. His films show a disdain for humanity, but in a funny way. When I finish a Kubrick or Lanthimos film, my usual takeaway is that we’re fucked, but we can laugh about it because what else can you do? 


Which brings me to Bugonia. Ignoring the alien aspect for a bit, this film is about how we’ve polarized ourselves as a species into belief systems beyond religion. We now, thanks to technology, can make our own insulated worlds where everything we read and watch that we agree with is the truth, and anything that refutes our views is simply false and most likely part of a secret plot to destroy society as we know it. 


This is most punctuated by Teddy and Michelle’s spaghetti dinner conversation. At one point this interaction takes place:


Michelle: “Truth.”

Teddy: “Lies.”

Michelle: “What’s the difference? I can’t change your mind. 

Teddy: “You’re right. You can’t.”


This is our world now, and Bugonia takes this to the extreme.


In this film, aliens are real and among us, pharmaceutical companies are using us as unwitting lab rats, the Earth is flat, and we are all hollow worker bees waiting for our overlords to pull the plug, which they do at the end. It’s presented as darkly comedic. It has to be because it’s all so inherently silly, even with all the death. 


I hate to apply messages to movies, especially when you can make movies like this mean whatever you want it to mean. But I can’t help but think Teddy is an example of what happens if we just write off the fringe elements of society as simply “crazy.” Sometimes “crazy” people take action. 


But, and this is why I don’t like applying messages, Teddy is right. At least, he’s right about Michelle being an alien. He’s wrong in thinking he ever had a chance of getting to that ship and having an intergalactic détente with a bomb strapped to his abdomen, but he’s right about a lot of stuff. If that’s the case, is the film saying all the conspiracy theories are right? As a liberal, Michelle’s estimation that Teddy is a product of his own internet echo chamber is kind of how I feel about most people who disagree with me, politically and otherwise. So by dismissing people who believe shit like the Earth is flat, is Bugonia telling me I’m part of the problem, and I’m just a worker bee?


I don’t think so. Teddy isn’t presented as a hero here. He manipulates and uses Don just as much as he claims the Andromedans (sp?) manipulate humanity. Everybody sucks, and it doesn’t matter who is right or wrong because the world is already broken beyond repair. So if that’s the gist of it all, why not have some fun and make all the crazy shit real?


Though, based on some reddit deep dives, not everyone believes the alien stuff in the film. Some claim everything after the explosion doesn’t actually happen and is just the imagination of Michelle’s concussed brain. I’m sure people have their own reasons for not believing the alien aspect of the film, but I disagree. I think some people just find it too silly, and rather than admit that a film they liked up to that point faltered (in their opinion), they decide it’s all just a hallucination. My problem with that is that it adds nothing thematically to the movie. We’re meant to consider these two sides of humanity for nearly two hours, then it’s all scrapped for ten minutes of “it was all just a dream”? Not only does that negate anything meaningful, it’s also boring.


Others would argue the opposite, and that Michelle being an actual alien negates the satire of corporate leaders being so indifferent to humans that they could be confused for aliens. Making her an actual alien weakens that. Perhaps, but it’s not like Michelle is surrounded by fellow aliens. There are plenty of humans on board with what corporations are doing. With or without alien interference, humans would still be on the destructive path we’re on. So Michelle being an alien does negate the theory for her character specifically, but not for all of humanity.


Whether or not Michelle is really an alien is the crux of the plot, and with most directors, I would assume the resolution would either be ambiguous, or it would be revealed that this was all just part of Teddy’s mental illness and unwillingness to accept the trauma that has happened to him. That would still be an interesting story, and all the performances would still be as great as they are, but it wouldn’t be nearly as memorable as finishing the film on a spaceship and all of humanity being killed off. 


But since this is a Yorgos Lanthimos movie, I went in expecting the reveal to be that she is an alien. But a few minutes in, I started to wonder, “Does he think we expect the alien reveal, so he’s actually going with the traditional mental illness approach? But is he expecting us to be expecting him to do that, and he’s going with the alien plot?” It’s the kind of circular thinking of a poisoned wine scenario in which characters keep swapping out the glasses trying to anticipate what the other person anticipates until no one knows what the hell is going on. This is why I love Lanthimos’s work. He has established that his films will go to extreme and unexpected places to the point that I could never be fully confident in knowing where his films will go. That’s what makes him such an exciting director to have working today. When you watch as many movies as I do, being surprised becomes a rare gift. 


It’s always great when a movie can be argued about concerning what’s real and what’s imagined, but most importantly, Lanthimos can be counted on to make something entertaining as well as thought-provoking. He doesn’t do it alone, of course. I really need to tone down the auteur theory shit, but I can’t help it with some directors. Bugonia is very much a Lanthimos film, but without the performances of Plemons, Stone, Aiden Delbis, Stavros Halkias, and Alicia Silverstone, this is not the same film. And the score is so perfectly over-the-top. I cannot think of this film without hearing the score, as well. And it wouldn't exist it at all without Will Tracy's script, based on Jang Joon-hwan's screenplay. In other words, I know this isn’t a solo creation, but it’s easier sometimes to write about movies that way. 


All of this is just to say Bugonia is one of my favorite films of the year. My top ten isn’t locked in just yet, but right now it’s Sinners then this. Lanthimos and co. just have this ability to craft these beautifully ugly stories that should be absolutely miserable to sit through, but instead I want to keep returning to it (I’ve watched Bugonia four times as of this writing). And it’s a movie I can dwell on about what’s real and what does it all mean, if anything, or I can turn my brain off and let the insanity wash over me like a bucket of Don’s blood from a shotgun blast. 



Random Thoughts


Just to drive some Google searches my way: the title Bugonia comes from Ancient Greek and is based on the belief that bees were spontaneously generated from a cow's carcass. So obviously there is the bee connection in the film, but it also works for current humanity being the result of the destruction of the Andromedans' first attempt at creating a species on Earth.

According to Plemons, Lanthimos only gave composer Jerskin Fendrix four key words to go with to make the score: Bees. Basement. Spaceship. Emma-bald.” (This is on IMDb trivia, as well.) That’s wild, especially since it’s my favorite score of the year (I didn’t expect to like any score more than Sinners, but it happened). It’s over-bearing, filled with jump-scares, poignant, triumphant; I love it.


I have not seen Save the Green Planet! I plan to soon, but I wanted to write about this before so I don’t look at it as a remake. I don’t mean that I don’t want to consider it a remake; I mean, I don’t want to get distracted by looking at the similarities and differences.


The juxtaposition of the opposing training styles at the beginning is very Rocky IV-esque.


First time I’ve heard semen referred to as “fuck filler.” I don’t like it.


Lanthimos is so goddamned Greek he had to go with Jennifer Aniston for the kidnapping masks.


“No one on Earth gives a single fuck about us.”


The idea of Stavros as a babysitter is hilarious. 


When Teddy goes to hit her with a chair for being the grammar police he truly is the internet personified.


Stavros having to act like he wants cake was a real stretch.


“I don’t get the news from the news.”


Not that there’s a good time for your former sexually abusive babysitter turned cop to pay you a visit, but this has to be the worst time it could have happened for Teddy.


“I never, ever did that to anybody else.” I mean, I guess that’s a good thing, but no way that would ever make a victim feel better.


I know these random thoughts are Stavros-heavy (pun intended), but I watch so much of his podcast, I can’t help but point out how fucking crazy it is to see him in this. One last one: when I first came across Stavvy as a comedian, I would have never guessed I would one day see Jessie Plemons bludgeon him to death with a shovel as his head was covered in bees like Nic Cage at the end of The Wicker Man.


Poor Don. Dude just wanted to whack it, play videogames, eat taquitos, and maybe one day find love. Is that so wrong, or is that living in a prison created by the agro-corporate overlords?


“I’m not a sick ape!” I bet you smell like one, Teddy.


Even when she comes limping in with Teddy, she’s still on that “you can leave at 5:30 if you think that’s okay” bullshit. Total alien behavior.


Monday, December 18, 2023

Poor Things - Kubrickian

Yorgos Lanthimos’s films have always been divisive, with films like Dogtooth, The Lobster, and The Killing of a Sacred Deer either completely working for people (like me) or falling completely flat on their deadpan faces for others. Then The Favourite came out and garnered a lot of awards attention (Olivia Colman won Best Actress and the film was nominated in nearly every major category). While The Favourite has its odd moments, it’s positively mainstream for a Lanthimos movie, which is why it disappointed me. I was afraid that Lanthimos had lost his weird edge. Then Poor Things kicked in the door holding a chicken dog, peed on the floor, tried to punch a baby, and let out a noxious burp bubble into the air.


In other words, Poor Things is wildly strange all around. It’s also the funniest, most well-acted, and inventive film of the year. (It’s also my personal favorite, and it won Best Picture from the Indiana Film Journalists Association.) 


Poor Things is hard to summarize, but here goes: Emma Stone plays Bella, a Frankenstein’s Monster-ish creation of scientist Baxter (Willem Dafoe). She begins the movie as an adult with the mind of a baby, but as she matures at a rapid rate, she decides to see the world with one of the best cinematic rapscallions of all time in Duncan Wedderburn (Mark Ruffalo, in a shockingly funny performance). Bella sees the best and worst of the world, and it’s all presented in fantastical, horrible, and hilarious ways. 


I typically do not like writing plot summaries (you can always just Google it or watch a trailer or something), but I liked the challenge of it for this one since I liked it so much. This movie simply works on every level for me in a way that I haven’t felt since Stanley Kubrick’s films (more on that later).


The writing (Tony McNamara, adapting the novel by Alasdair Gray) is the standout element, as the entire film is quotable. It’s funny, but the straightforward, child-like dialogue of Bella also points out many of the ridiculous elements of humanity. And while it’s all quirky and funny, I still cared about most of the characters, though they could be framed as villains in other films (especially Dafoe’s character). 


It takes skill to deliver the funniest lines of the script, especially in Lanthimos’s signature tone. And Emma Stone is perfect. She has to play an adult baby, a prostitute, and a scientist all in one role. Her performance as an adult baby alone is adwards-worthy, the rest is just a bonus. And Mark Ruffalo is an amazing foil to her. It’s funny when he just goes along with Bella’s oddness, but it’s the best when she finally breaks him, causing him wonder, “What the fuck are you talking about?” multiple times throughout. His transformation throughout the film is equally impressive and amusing. 


The writing and acting are so great in this film, it almost seems to be a waste that the music and production design are so unique, as well, because they are nearly an afterthought when they would be the standouts in other, weaker films. The discordant score captures the unsettling mood of each scene. And the creatures (what other film has a chicken dog walking around with no one talking about it?) and set decoration complete the picture by creating a world that is recognizable but also fantastical. 


All of this is enough to make this one of my favorite movies in recent years. But it’s the Kubrickian element that I think will cement this among my all-time favorite films. Lanthimos is no stranger to the Kubrick comparison. Anyone who uses deadpan humor, tracking shots, and slow zooms gets compared to Kubrick at some point. This is why I usually don’t like calling things Kubrickian these days. While Poor Things does have all those Kubrick-like elements, I label it as Kubrickian for what it represents in Lanthimos’s career arc. 


Poor Things isn’t actually similar, story-wise, to anything Kubrick would make. But it is the kind of movie he would make. Kubrick, while toiling around in similar thematic areas with his films, never tried to make the same film twice. And Lanthimos appears to be on that same track. The fact that I didn’t love The Favourite now seems like a good thing. If he kept making movies like The Lobster over and over, it would get tiring immediately. To go from Sacred Deer to The Favourite to Poor Things shows a willingness to go to new, interesting places, much like how Kubrick could go from Barry Lyndon to The Shining to Full Metal Jacket. The style may be similar, but the content shows a desire to keep things interesting. And for Lanthimos, that also means getting very weird sometimes, and that works for me. 


Random Thoughts


I only focused on Stone and Ruffalo, but truly every performance in this is great. Dafoe is amazing, of course, and Ramy Youssef has many great moments reacting to Dafoe’s craziness. 


This is a gloriously demented mashup of Benjamin Button, Jack, and Forrest Gump.


“Fate had brought me a dead body and a live infant. It was obvious.”

“It…was?”


“She grabbed my hairy business!”


“I was chloroforming goats all morning. I may have ingested too much.”


Lanthimos is truly like Kubrick. It’s not just that their films share some superficial similarities, it’s the tone in which they are made. This very much strikes me as the type of film Kubrick would make if he were still alive.


I worry myself in typing this, but Yorgos Lanthimos gets me.


I am so happy to live in a world in which a company is willing to give this lunatic a lot of money to make hilarious shit like this, which is a film that dares to ask, “What if Dr. Frankenstein was good at his job?” 


The segment of her just wanting to eat, drink, and fuck reminded me of when Bender became a human on Futurama.


I never knew I needed to hear Mark Ruffalo say, “What the fuck are you talking about?” in a British accent. 


“Hope is smashable. Realism is not.”


Usually, I think movies don’t justify their length, but I could watch Emma Stone break down situations in a deadpan manner for five hours, at least. My favorite was her working out how it made sense to start working in a Parisian brothel.


Her first customer kind of looks like Will Forte from the plane sketch in I Think You Should Leave.


“Hence, I seek employment at your musty-smelling establishment of good-time fornication.”


“She is no different to the chicken dog.”


“He has cancer, you fucking idiot.”


This is the most exciting character Ruffalo has played in years, maybe ever.

2023 IFJA Awards

 


The Indiana Film Journalists Association has named “Poor Things” the best film of 2023, a strong showing that also included Best Lead Performance for Emma Stone, Mark Ruffalo for Best Supporting Performance, Best Director for Yorgos Lanthimos, Best Adapted Screenplay (Tony McNamara), Original Vision and Best Ensemble Acting. 


Its seven wins is the most ever in the 15 years of the IFJA awards.


“Oppenheimer,” which was named runner-up for Best Film, also was runner-up in four other categories: directing, lead and supporting performance, and ensemble acting. It notched three wins: Cinematography, Editing and Musical Score. 


Eight other films were voted Finalists for Best Film. Along with the winner and runner-up, they represent the IFJA’s selection as the Top 10 movies of the year. 


“The Zone of Interest” was awarded Best Foreign Language Film and “Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse” won Best Animated Film. “Kokomo City” was named Best Documentary.


David Hemingson took the Best Original Screenplay award for “The Holdovers.” Writer/director Celine Song earned the Breakout of the Year Award for her debut film, “Past Lives.”


The Edward Johnson-Ott Hoosier Award, which goes to a film or filmmaker with Indiana ties, went to Sam Mirpoorian, director of the documentary “Greener Pastures.”


IFJA members issued this statement for the Edward Johnson-Ott Hoosier Award:

 

“Sam Mirpoorian has shown that an Indiana-based filmmaker can make major waves across the cinematic landscape. His documentary ‘Greener Pastures’ is a powerful look at the lives of independent farmers shot over several years, traveling alongside them before and during Covid, observing their struggles with depression and substance abuse but always demanding we see their intrinsic dignity as those who nourish us. Mirpoorian has rendered those who were largely invisible indelible in our eyes and hearts.”

 

In addition to the winner, IFJA recognizes a runner-up in each category (with one exception, noted below). Here is the complete list:


Best Picture

Winner: Poor Things

Runner-up: Oppenheimer

 

Other Best Film Finalists: (listed alphabetically)

Are You There God? It’s Me, Margaret.

Barbie

The Holdovers

John Wick: Chapter 4

Killers of the Flower Moon

May December

Past Lives

Robot Dreams

 

Best Animated Film

Winner: Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse

Runner-up: Robot Dreams

 

Best Foreign Language Film

Winner: The Zone of Interest

Runner-up: Godzilla Minus One

 

Best Documentary Film

Winner: Kokomo City

Runner-up: 20 Days in Mariupol

 

Best Original Screenplay

Winner: David Hemingson, The Holdovers

Runner-up: Samy Burch (screenplay/story) and Alex Mechanik (story), May December

 

Best Adapted Screenplay

Winner: Tony McNamara, Poor Things

Runner-up: Greta Gerwig and Noah Baumbach, Barbie

 

Best Director

Winner: Yorgos Lanthimos, Poor Things

Runner-up: Christopher Nolan, Oppenheimer

 

Best Lead Performance

Winner: Emma Stone, Poor Things

Runner-up: Cillian Murphy, Oppenheimer

 

Best Supporting Performance

Winner: Mark Ruffalo, Poor Things

Runner-up: Robert Downey, Jr., Oppenheimer

 

Best Vocal/Motion Capture Performance

Winner: Hailee Steinfeld, Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse

Runner-up: Shameik Moore, Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse

 

Best Ensemble Acting

Winner: Poor Things

Runner-up: Oppenheimer

 

Best Musical Score

Winner: Ludwig Göransson, Oppenheimer

Runner-up: Robbie Robertson, Killers of the Flower Moon

 

Breakout of the Year

Winner: Celine Song, Past Lives

Runner-up: Charles Melton, May December

 

Best Cinematography

Winner: Hoyte van Hoytema, Oppenheimer

Runner-up: Dan Laustsen, John Wick: Chapter 4

 

Best Editing

Winner: Jennifer Lame, Oppenheimer

Runner-up: Thelma Schoonmaker, Killers of the Flower Moon

 

Best Stunt/Movement Choreography

Winner: Jeremy Marinas (fight coordinator), Scott Rogers (stunt coordinator) and Stephen Levy (stunt choreographer), John Wick: Chapter 4

Runner-up: Jennifer White (choreographer) and Lisa Welham (associate choreographer), Barbie

 

Original Vision Award

Winner: Poor Things

Runner-up: Barbie

 

The Edward Johnson-Ott Hoosier Award*

Winner: Director Sam Mirpoorian, Greener Pastures


*As a special honor, no runner-up is named for the Hoosier Award. It is named after founding IFJA member and longtime NUVO Newsweekly critic Edward Johnson-Ott.


About IFJA: The Indiana Film Journalists Association was established in 2009 to celebrate cinema and promote quality film criticism in the Hoosier State. To be eligible for our awards, a film must have had a general release on any platform during the current calendar year, screened to IFJA critics in advance of a following year release date, or play in a major Indiana film festival.

 

http://indianafilmjournalists.com